“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr said.
That conclusion has long been apparent to anyone outside of the Trump campaign’s misinformation vortex. But it’s still significant coming from Barr, who has to this point proven all too willing to protect Trump’s interests. Not only did Barr baldly misrepresent special counsel Robert Mueller’s reporton Russian election interference and Trump’s obstruction of justice, he spent the months before the election overhyping the threat of vote-by-mail fraud.
Even after the election, Barr had intimated that the Justice Department could act on Trump’s behalf. On November 9, he wrote a memo that authorized federal prosecutors to investigate “substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities,” overturning a years-long DOJ precedent not to step in until after elections have been certified. The departure was so extreme that it prompted the resignation of the director of the department’s election crimes branch, Richard Pilger. Four days later, The Washington Post reported that a group of 16 current assistant US attorneys had asked Barr to withdraw the memo, arguing that it had thrust “career prosecutors into partisan politics,” and that “the policy change was not based in fact.”
Barr’s decision to sit this one out was not a foregone conclusion. And yet now he has gone out of his way to swat down allegations of fraud both general and specific. “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud, and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results,” Barr told the AP, referring to the outlandish conspiracy theory, pushed by Trump and those in his circle, focusing on a company called Dominion Voting Systems. “And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”
Even if the Justice Department had produced large-scale fraud allegations, that alone would not have been enough to change the results of the election. “DOJ has prosecutorial authority to go after individuals, but no independent authority to change the count,” says Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School who specializes in election law. “Even if DOJ decided to prosecute someone for submitting a fraudulent ballot, a state could still disagree and count that ballot in the tally.”
By not indulging the president’s conspiratorial tendencies, Barr has at least deprived Trump and his enablers of additional kindling to their “rigged election” bonfire. The president’s legal team, led by Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, continues to insist that Trump won, despite repeatedly failing to produce any meaningful evidence of voter fraud in court. Trump himself tweeted or retweeted claims, news segments, and hearings related to election fraud 27 times on Tuesday alone. (That number will likely continue to climb throughout the evening, although as of this writing the president had yet to directly address Barr’s statements.)
Trump has no viable path forward. He never did. Despite all the noise, the Electoral College will still formally cast votes on December 14, eliminating any lingering doubt as to the results. “Barr’s statement is yet another nail in the coffin, but the coffin was really already quite securely shut,” says Levitt. “It’s like multiplying by zero: You can keep multiplying all you want, but you’re just going to end up with the same answer.”
Nevertheless, Trump’s refusal to concede has had a corrosive effect. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on November 18 showed that more than half of Republicans think Trump “rightfully won” the election. The longer and more forcefully Trump insists on inhabiting this bizarro world, the greater the risk that his base will reject president-elect Joe Biden’s legitimacy, with potentially disastrous results.
Which is where you can find the real value in Barr’s comments today. There are few more committed Trump apologists than the attorney general. That hasn’t changed; the AP also reported Tuesday that Barr had appointed US attorney John Durham as special counsel, giving him added protections as he probes the FBI’s 2016 investigation of Trump. When even Barr breaks ranks with the president’s election conspiracy theories, however, it gives reality a powerful countervailing support.
“With the greatest respect to the attorney general, his opinion appears to be without any knowledge or investigation of the substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud,” said Giuliani and Ellis in a statement Tuesday. But there is no such evidence. There are no widespread irregularities. If there had been, William Barr would have been first in line to tell the world.
source: wired.com by BRIAN BARRETT